【teen shemale sex videos】
American diners are teen shemale sex videoseating fewer burgers, steaks and meatballs, and that's making a noticeable dent in the nation's greenhouse gas emissions, a new study found.
U.S. beef consumption fell by nearly one-fifth -- or 19 percent -- on a per capita basis from 2005 to 2014, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) said Wednesday in a report. Eating less beef resulted in pollution reductions equal to removing 39 million cars from U.S. roads.
SEE ALSO: New coral reefs study finally gives us some good news"I'm used to bad news on climate, but this is a rare bright spot," said Sujatha Bergen, the study's lead author and a policy specialist in NRDC's food and agriculture program.
"It doesn't mean that we've done all we can, but it's very motivating to know we've made some emissions reductions," she said.
Via GiphyHowever, some of those environmental gains were undermined by rising consumption of other carbon-intensive foods, such as cheese, yogurt and butter, according to NRDC.
Cattle industry groups also disputed some of the report's takeaways, arguing that rising beef exports -- not a new distaste for meat -- could explain the drop in per capita beef eating.
Regardless, diet-related emissions are declining in the U.S., federal data show.

Cows have an outsized climate impact for a few main reasons.
The animals eat an abundant amount of feed, which is grown with petroleum-based fertilizers and typically comes from industrial corn and soy fields. Forests around the world have been cleared to accommodate cattle grazing and feed production as well.
Cow burps and farts also emit significant levels of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Copious piles of cow manure are spread across pastures, a practice that results in greenhouse gas emissions as well.

Globally, the livestock sector accounts for about 14.5 percent of total human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, according to the U.N.'s Food and Agricultural Organization.
For the NRDC report, Bergen and her colleagues scoured the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Food Availability data set. The agency estimates how much food is produced for domestic consumption for more than 200 basic commodities, including beef, flour and sugar.
Next, researchers examined the Environmental Protection Agency's inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. They compared every year from 2006 to 2014 against emissions in 2005.

By eating less beef, the U.S. avoided an estimated 185 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions over that 10-year period, the NRDC said. Lower consumption of other products -- including milk, pork, shellfish and high fructose corn syrup -- brought the total to about 271 million metric tons of avoided climate-warming pollution.
"Whether they know it or not, Americans have been fighting it with their forks," Bergen said in an earlier blog post.
The NRDC didn't examine why U.S. consumers are eating less beef, though Bergen said it may be a "welcome side effect" of people becoming more concerned about the environmental and personal health impacts of eating too much red meat.
But beef industry experts suggested the reason for beef's decline is likely due to reasons other than changing consumer tastes.

Lance Zimmerman of CattleFax, an industry information service, noted that record drought in Texas and other cattle-growing areas drastically lowered the headcount of cattle in recent years.
U.S. beef production has since recovered, but not all of that extra meat stayed home. The United States was a net exporter of beef from 2011 to 2013, meaning that even though the nation was producing more beef -- likely resulting in higher emissions -- Americans weren't actually the ones eating it, Zimmerman said.
Globally, meat consumption is expected to soar by nearly 73 percent by 2050 unless people make a concerted effort to cut back, the Food and Agricultural Organization estimated.
Beyond chowing down on fewer burgers, consumers should waste less of the meat they do eat.
About 20 percent of edible beef ends up in the trash, as do about 40 to 50 percent of fruits and vegetables, said Sarah Place, the senior director of sustainable beef production research for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, a trade group.
"If we could cut beef waste in half, we'd improve the sustainability of the whole industry by 10 percent overnight," Place said.
Featured Video For You
How to turn your kitchen into a tiny produce farm
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Best IPL deal: Save $80 on Braun IPL Silk·Expert
2025-06-27 09:35Snapchat is testing a Boomerang
2025-06-27 08:47Emilia Clarke says goodbye to 'Game of Thrones' on Instagram
2025-06-27 08:38Best free AI courses in April 2025
2025-06-27 07:17Popular Posts
E3 2017 Trailer Roundup: Upcoming PC Games
2025-06-27 08:53Look inside the new 'Stranger Things' comic book coming this fall
2025-06-27 08:52McDonald's is ditching plastic straws in the UK and Ireland
2025-06-27 08:19How to live stream the New York Knicks in 2025
2025-06-27 07:23Featured Posts
Albania announces one
2025-06-27 09:29'Fortnite' composer Pinar Toprak will score 'Captain Marvel'
2025-06-27 08:18Whole Foods only follows Beyoncé and Sting on Instagram. WHY?
2025-06-27 08:13Meta Quest 3S (256GB) deal: Score a free $30 Best Buy gift card
2025-06-27 07:40Popular Articles
Ariana Grande and Pete Davidson are my new obsession
2025-06-27 09:14Grimes is here to actually make you feel good about owning a Mac
2025-06-27 08:31Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (4216)
Follow Information Network
We tried Sony's new XYN headset: a game
2025-06-27 09:42Happiness Information Network
Here are the best books of 2018, so far, according to Amazon
2025-06-27 09:13Unobstructed Information Network
Twitter thread offers powerful context as kids are ripped from parents
2025-06-27 07:57Ignition Information Network
Justin Roiland is here for nudity in the Nintendo universe
2025-06-27 07:32Flying Information Network
Use Your Gaming Laptop and Play On Battery Power? Is It Possible?
2025-06-27 07:17