【Watch online Dangerous Sex Games (2005)】
Ouch,Watch online Dangerous Sex Games (2005) Charlie! Don't leave us!
The Davies-Carr family, who posted one of YouTube's most-watched viral videos, "Charlie bit my finger," back in 2007, announced that the beloved clip will be deleted from YouTube on May 23 and auctioned off as an NFT.
An NFT, which stands for non-fungible token, gives buyers sole ownership of an original and unique digital work. Over the past few months we've seen popular internet memes, images, and videos sold as NFTs. In Feb. 2021, the Nyan Cat meme sold as an NFT for around $600,000. In May, the "Disaster Girl" meme sold for more than $500,000. And "Charlie bit my finger" is about to join the club.
The charming home movie, which remains one of the most memorable viral clips of the 2000s, shows a young British boy named Harry holding his toddler-aged brother, Charlie. Over the course of the 55-second video, Charlie bites Harry's finger twice and a series of toddler laughter, tears, and adorable quotes — including "Ouch, Charlie!" and "Charlie bit me!" — ensue.
The two brothers, who are now teenagers (Harry, 17 and Charlie, 15), see the auction as "the perfect opportunity to embrace the next iteration of the internet," according to a statement on charliebitme.com.
In addition to being the sole owner of this internet relic, the highest bidder in the NFT auction will get a chance to create their own parody of the viral video with the video's two original stars.
The auction opened at 10:00 a.m. ET on May 22, and the video, shown below, will be removed from YouTube on Sunday, May 23. You can stay up-to-date with bids here before the auction closes on May 23 at 10:00 a.m. ET.
Get your final views in now, folks. And say goodbye to yet another iconic component of the good internet era.
UPDATE: May 22, 2021, 1 p.m. EDT An earlier version of this story referring to the Harry and Charlie seen in the original video as eight years old and six years old, respectively. They were...not that old at the time. The text has been corrected and we apologize for the error.
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Apple iPhone 17 Pro leaks highlight major new design change
2025-06-26 16:41Explaining corecore, TikTok's newest aesthetic
2025-06-26 16:31Survival Story: An Interview with David France by Garth Greenwell
2025-06-26 16:21Instagram is here to stay. So people are changing how they use it.
2025-06-26 15:45How to Secure Your Android Phone and Get the Most Out of Smart Lock
2025-06-26 15:04Popular Posts
Asus VivoWatch 6 AERO measures blood pressure and ECG
2025-06-26 16:45Bing & Ruth and Amy & David
2025-06-26 16:19Jonathan Franzen Says No
2025-06-26 16:07War and Peace Clickbait
2025-06-26 15:02Best Garmin deal: Save over $100 on Garmin Forerunner 955
2025-06-26 14:59Featured Posts
Skywatching is lit in May, says NASA
2025-06-26 16:52To the Attic: Virginia Woolf and Abelardo Morell
2025-06-26 16:42Black Friday Fire TV deals 2023: Amazon's sale is live
2025-06-26 14:44Apple iPhone 17 Pro leaks highlight major new design change
2025-06-26 14:17Popular Articles
Best Hydro Flask deal: Save $10 on a 24
2025-06-26 16:52The Philosophy of Fly
2025-06-26 15:17Suitcase Full of Candy: An Interview with Svetlana Alexievich
2025-06-26 14:50Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (9894)
Progress Information Network
Best Hydro Flask deal: Save $10 on a 24
2025-06-26 16:38Mark Information Network
Best deals of the day Jan. 13: The Sony HT
2025-06-26 15:51Sharing Information Network
Dear Lynda: Fickle Secret Admirers and Knowing the Ending by Lynda Barry
2025-06-26 15:50Exquisite Information Network
I Read ‘Playboy’ for the Comix
2025-06-26 15:48Exquisite Information Network
The State of PC Gaming in 2016
2025-06-26 15:14