【Movies】
Lindsay Lohan's lawsuit against the publisher of Grand Theft Auto Vwas dismissed by a panel of New York judges Thursday,Movies after it determined her likeness was not used anywhere in the game or its marketing materials.
Lohan, along with Mob Wivesstar Karen Gravano, sued publisher Take-Two in 2014. Lohan claimed the blond, bikini-clad illustration that appeared on GTA V's box art and loading screens was supposed to be her. In particular, she referenced the "bikini, shoulder-length blonde hair, jewelry, cell phone, and 'signature peace sign' pose" as evidence, according to court documents. (She's referring to the right image above.)
SEE ALSO: Tips for surviving your first hours in 'No Man's Sky'Additionally, Lohan alleged one of the characters you could encounter during one of the game's paparazzi side missions was meant to resemble and satirize her.
You May Also Like
Gravano had similar claims, arguing that side mission character Andrea Bottino closely resembled her.
Specifically, Gravano argues that the character uses the same phrases she uses; that the character's father mirrors Gravano's own father; that the character's story about moving out west to safe houses mirrors Gravano's fear of being ripped out of her former life and being sent to Nebraska; that the character's story about dealing with the character's father cooperating with the state government is the same as Gravano dealing with the repercussions of her father's cooperation; and that the character's father not letting the character do a reality show is the same as Gravano's father publicly decrying her doing a reality show.
But on Thursday, the New York Supreme Court disagreed, dismissing both suits. As the court document states, neither woman's name, photograph or image was actually used in the game. Even if the game did base characters on them, because Grand Theft Auto V is "a work of fiction or satire," it is allowed to do so.
As a side win for game fans, the judges agreed that video games deserve First Amendment protection, "like the protected books, plays and movies that proceeded them."
Take-Two argued for the lawsuit's dismissal since its filing, arguing that Lohan "filed it for publicity purposes."
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
Afternoon at the Nap Factory
2025-06-26 01:22'Stranger Things' Comic
2025-06-26 00:39The Perishable Politician
2025-06-25 23:42Popular Posts
Afternoon at the Nap Factory
2025-06-26 01:25UK officials lay down new drone rules for amateur users
2025-06-26 00:49The 20 most in
2025-06-26 00:31Disastrous 'Pokémon Go' Fest ends with anger and refunds
2025-06-26 00:29Alabama’s Tiny Terror
2025-06-25 23:31Featured Posts
Making Sausage of Salazar
2025-06-26 01:23Betterment is now worth $800 million
2025-06-26 01:23'The Walking Dead' Season 8 trailer: Watch
2025-06-25 23:504 big lies you can't undo at the office—so don't ever tell them
2025-06-25 23:46The Usual Suspects
2025-06-25 23:26Popular Articles
Flint, A Complete City
2025-06-26 00:48Watch Gal Gadot's thunderous Hall H return at Comic
2025-06-25 23:51John Heard, beloved 'Home Alone' dad, is dead at 72
2025-06-25 23:09Yesterday’s Liberal
2025-06-25 22:48Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (691)
Micro Video Information Network
Finger-Lickin’ Lulz
2025-06-26 01:00Information Information Network
Top 5 Chinese LGBTQ apps in 2022 · TechNode
2025-06-26 00:55Leadership Information Network
Delta passengers out of this airport can use a fingerprint to board
2025-06-26 00:12Sharing Information Network
'Krypton' isn't just a Superman prequel
2025-06-25 23:56Style Information Network
A Shoot-Em-Up for the Resistance
2025-06-25 22:49